| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Michael Shellenberger ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shellenberger is an American author, environmental policy expert, and the president of Breakthrough Institute. He was named a ''Time'' magazine Heroes of the Environment (2008),〔(Bryan Walsh, ''Time Magazine'', September 24, 2008 )〕 winner of the 2008 Green Book Award,〔(Stevens' Center for Science Writing, January 8, 2008 )〕 co-editor of ''Love Your Monsters'' (2011) and co-author of ''Break Through'' (Houghton Mifflin 2007) and ''The Death of Environmentalism'' (2004).〔(Felicity Barringer, "Paper Sets Off A Debate On Environmentalism's Future," ''New York Times'' February 6, 2005 )〕 He and his co-author Ted Nordhaus have been described as "ecological modernists"〔http://e360.yale.edu/feature/new_green_vision_technology_as_our_planets_last_best_hope/2671/〕 and "eco-pragmatists."〔(Keith Kloor, "The Great Schism in the Environmental Movement," December 12, 2012 )〕
== Breakthrough Institute ==
Shellenberger is president of the Breakthrough Institute, which he co-founded with Ted Nordhaus in 2003.〔 Today, Breakthrough Institute consists of a policy staff, an annual conference, a policy journal, and a network of affiliated fellows.〔(Joe Garofoli, "Thinkers Take Apart Liberalism in Order to Save It," ''San Francisco Chronicle,'' June 16, 2011 )〕〔(Mark Schmitt, ''The New Republic,'' "Has Liberalism Entered a Post-Obama Era?, June 30, 2011 )〕〔(The Breakthrough Institute )〕
Breakthrough Institute analyses of energy, climate and innovation policy have been cited by National Public Radio〔(Christopher Joyce, "Nuclear Woes Push Japan into a New Energy Future," ''NPR News'', March 11, 2012 )〕 the ''Wall Street Journal〔(Joseph White, Obama's Energy Shift: It's Not About Climate, ''Wall Street Journal'', January 27, 2011 )〕 and C-SPAN.〔(C-Span, "Role of Government in Energy Innovation," May 22, 2012 )〕
Shellenberger has co-authored analyses of cap and trade climate legislation,〔(Bryan Walsh, "What the Energy Bill Really Means for CO2 Emissions," ''Time Magazine'', June 27, 2009 )〕 of the "planetary boundaries" hypothesis,〔("Boundary Conditions," ''The Economist,'' June 16, 2012 )〕〔(David Biello, "Walking the Line: How to Identify Safe Limits for Human Impacts on the Planet," ''Scientific American'', June 13, 2012 )〕 energy rebound from energy efficiency measures,〔(John Tierney, "When Energy Efficiency Sullies the Environment," ''New York Times,'' March 7, 2011 )〕 carbon pricing,〔(Michael Totty, "Should There Be a Price on Carbon?" ''Wall Street Journal'', October 5, 2012 )〕 renewable energy subsidies,〔("The End of Clean Energy Subsidies?" ''New York Times'', May 5, 2012 )〕〔(David Leonhardt, "There's Still Hope for the Planet," New York Times, July 21, 2012 )〕 nuclear energy,〔(Michael Totty, "Nuclear Energy's Fall — and Rise," ''Wall Street Journal'', April 17, 2010 )〕 and shale gas〔〔(Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, "A Boom in Shale Gas? Credit the Feds," ''Washington Post'', December 16, 2011 )〕〔(Kevin Begos, "Decades of Federal Dollars Helped Fuel Gas Boom," ''Associated Press'', September 23, 2012 )〕
The Institute argues that climate policy should be focused on higher levels of public funding on technology innovation to "make clean energy cheap," and has been critical of climate policies like cap and trade and carbon pricing that are focused primarily on raising energy prices.〔(Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, "Second Life: A Manifeto for a New Environmentalism," ''The New Republic'', September 24, 2007 )〕〔(Richard Harris, "Putting a Financial Spin on Global Warming," NPR News, June 24, 2009 )〕〔(Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, "How to Change the Global Energy Conversation, ''Wall Street Journal'', November 28, 2012 )〕〔("Fast, Clean and Cheap: Cutting Global Warming's Gordian Knot," ''Harvard Law and Policy Review'', January 2008, Vol. II, No. 1 )〕
The Institute has conducted research showing that shale gas and other major technological innovations were created by American government institutions and public financing. The Institute advocates higher levels of public spending on technology innovation, which they argue will lead to higher environmental quality, economic growth, and quality of life.〔〔〔
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Michael Shellenberger」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|